Agencies | Online Services | Policies | Transparency.Arkansas.gov
Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee

Click Here To See The JEAC Topical Index
Click Here To View JEAC SummariesClick Here To Read JEAC's Procedural Rules

Click Here To Read JEAC's Commission Member's Biographies

Judicial Discpline and Disability Web Page
Arkansas Judicial Home Page

Official Homepage for the State of Arkansas

May 7, 1999

 

 

The Honorable Steven G. Peer
Municipal Court, City of Van Buren
Municipal Complex
1003 Broadway
Van Buren, Arkansas 72956

RE: Advisory Opinion # 99-05

Dear Judge Peer:

Your letter of April 13, 1999 states that in your position as Van Buren Municipal Judge, you are authorized to appoint the Municipal Court Clerk. A candidate for the position is the wife of your first cousin.

Canon 3 (C) (4) of the Arkansas Code of Judicial Conduct provides: AA judge shall not make unnecessary appointments. " judge should exercise his power of appointment only on the basis of merit, avoiding nepotism and favoritism. No judge shall employ a spouse or other relative unless it has been affirmatively demonstrated to the Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission that it is impossible for the judge to hire any other qualified person to fill the position . . . ." The commentary to that Canon states: ". . . Nepotism is the appointing of relatives within the third degree of relationship by affinity or consanguinity. . . ." The terminology section of the Code defines Athird degree of relationship" as "The following persons are relatives within the third degree of relationship: great-grandparent, grandparent, uncle, aunt, brother, sister, child, grandchild, great-grandchild, nephew, or niece". We note that this definition does not include first cousins.

In addition, while the code 3 (E) (1)(d) section on disqualification expressly covers spouses, the 3 (C) (4) provision on nepotism does not.

In contrast, Ark. Code Ann. ' 28-9-212 counts first cousins as falling within the second degree of relationship. See Morton v. Benton Publishing Company, Inc., 291 Ark. 620, 727 S.W. 2d 824 (1987) (disqualification was mandatory where one of the parties involved was the husband of the judge=s first cousin despite lack of contact or closeness). In addition, the Arkansas statues disqualify the judge if a relative within the fourth degree of consanguinity or affinity is a party. See Ark. Code Ann. '' 16-13-214, 16-13-312, 16-14-103, 16-15-111, and 16-19-206. Our advisory opinion 98-04 notes the difference between the Code method of determining relationship and the statutory method. But that opinion involved judicial disqualification in chancery court.

Most importantly, the statutes do not cover nepotism. The Code of Judicial Conduct is the basis for the restriction on nepotism, and it does not incorporate the statutory method of determining relationship, but contains its own definition.

In light of the specific language and definition in the Code of Judicial Conduct, we conclude that you may consider the spouse of your first cousin for appointment without the need to seek the approval of the Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission.

Sincerely,

 

Howard W. Brill

For the Committee

 

Judge Steele Hays concurs.

Judge Edwin Alderson not participating.

Home | Summaries of Opinions and Full Opinions
Procedural Rules
| Biographies of Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee
Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission  | Arkansas Judiciary Home Page
Arkansas Home Page